SearchMob!


Powered by Rollyo

Recent Comment
Spotlight

  • Reader Stone writes: I think this much is clear: Yahoo only outsources search to Google if they're bought by a financial or private equity firm. [go]

Recent Comments

  • Brian Hayashi: " MSFT has been quietly working on home au ..." [go]
  • John: " If it's a hypervisor, I hope they're buy ..." [go]
  • billse: " Is it April 1st already? ..." [go]
  • Bruce Bergwall: " Timing IS everything! History is strew ..." [go]
  • nmw: " quite controversial: does the professor ..." [go]
  • Juergen Fesslmeier: " Dear John, Great panelists by the way! ..." [go]
  • web-cite: " Completely agree re #3. CPM ads on socia ..." [go]
  • * Miss Universe: " Now this is the ultimate in cool! Just w ..." [go]
  • tanya: " I must be in the minority. I like Mercha ..." [go]
  • Rob: " This is simply VM-ware. Microsoft wants ..." [go]
  • john: " I think it has to do with the next itera ..." [go]
  • DM: " To Bruce: The "ALL ON" button on my remo ..." [go]
  • tina: " hypervisor definitely. good call josh. ..." [go]
  • Jean-Marie Le Ray: " Hi John, Do you know something about Fa ..." [go]
  • Tony: " Comcast is definitely Craptastic. my Co ..." [go]
  • John Battelle: " A well placed source asks: 1) What is i ..." [go]

PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'

thesearch_bookcover.jpg

Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...

You can also buy the audio version here.

Check my book page for more info.

Blogger's Rights

Top Posts

Active Topics

Monthly Archives

About John Battelle

Searchblog Newsletter

Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:


Calendar

October 2007
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Syndicate

Powered by

July 27, 2005 3:09 PM

On The LA Times, Kinsley, and the Wikitorial

LatimesThe LA Times (caveat, I spent a glorious three months there as an indentured servant before leaving to join the founders at Wired) recently attempted to push their own boundaries online by rolling out a "wikitorial" - in which the paper allowed its readers to comment upon and edit the Times' editorials.

It was a good idea, but poorly executed. The site attracted trolls and showoffs, and was quickly shut down. Dan Gillmor has a good overview of why it didn't work here, and adds his thoughts on what they could have done better.

But when I read about this, I instantly recognized a core problem with the approach: it was top down community, rather than bottom up. Michael Kinsley, who created the site for the Times, was attempting to force a considered, editorial structure onto a set of readers who had yet to identify themselves or their own interests in any kind of structured way. It was doomed to fail, because communities can't be created by editorial structures - editorial structures must be created by communities.

This is a classic failing of old school media thinking. Sure, folks could build on top of the Times' editorials, but then again, why would they? The reason folks build stuff is to build it together, and to do that, they have to know one another, have a shared set of mores, have a conversation that is already going.

A far better approach would have been to create a platform for readers to create their own communities. Leaders will emerge, voices will break out, and conversations will get started. Then the community itself will have a sense of ownership of the media, and begin to moderate out the trolls. It's one thing for the LA Times to kill the trolls - that feels like censorship. It's another for the community itself to do it.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On The LA Times, Kinsley, and the Wikitorial:

» On LA Times and Community from FMPublishing
I posted on this issue here at Searchblog. These thoughts inform our ideas behind FM...... [Read More]

» Parole sacrosante from Alberto Mucignat
It was doomed to fail, because communities can't be created by editorial structures - editorial structures must be created by communities. Con questa frase che racchiude l'essenza del web, John Battelle chiude la discussione sull'occasione persa del LA [Read More]

» Self-moderating discussion and news from chris.were dot com
The reason folks build stuff is to build it together, and to do that, they have to know one another, have a shared set of mores, have a conversation that is already going. ... [Read More]

» wikitorialist veel from Tehnokratt!
Ross'i mitme-päeva-tagune postitus jäi silma: Editorial Structure and Social Media , viitab John Battelle'i postitusele On The LA Times, Kinsley, and the Wikitorial . [Read More]

Comments

John you've totally nailed the way they should have done it.

It's a shame because it was a really neat idea. Now with Mr Kinsley on his way out no one will probably spend the political capital at that paper to ever try it again.

It still pains me that Microsoft acquired the wonderful E-quill and promptly shut it down. E-quill made it really easy to mark up a web page with highlighting, post-its, etc.

Post a comment

Human detector
Please enter the letter "c" in the field below. If you want to preview your comment before posting, enter the secret letter after previewing, not now, as the letter will change upon preview.

Enter the letter from above: