Powered by Rollyo

Recent Comment
Spotlight

  • Reader JG writes: Then again, power users don't click ads. So maybe this is the elephant in

    the room that no one is talking about.

    [go]

Recent Comments

  • S. Thompson: " It's November 15, 2007 and Merchantcircl ..." [go]
  • JG: " I second Merijn's comments. Sometimes I ..." [go]
  • Jay: " J is one hundred percent correct. I was ..." [go]
  • Merijn Terheggen: " People come to your blog because of you. ..." [go]
  • jenkins: " Quigo is a HUGE winner. Where's the post ..." [go]
  • J: " Frankly I'm concerned that Facebook is f ..." [go]
  • Search◊ Engines Web: " The idea is not to give up - but to defe ..." [go]
  • Phil: " I have to strongly disagree with comment ..." [go]
  • Rodrigo: " He will be a presidential candidate? ..." [go]
  • nmw: " hmmm -- I thought I posted a link to rag ..." [go]
  • Ben Ortega: " You're just realizing you should be a de ..." [go]
  • nmw: " Great link! Definitely watch the video - ..." [go]
  • * MISS UNIVERSE: " Well, well...look who's getting on the ' ..." [go]
  • Greg: " I have had the worst experience with the ..." [go]
  • Rodrigo: " Bush no more failling miserably to googl ..." [go]
  • JG: " What about the data Google collects f ..." [go]

PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'

thesearch_bookcover.jpg

Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...

You can also buy the audio version here.

Check my book page for more info.

Blogger's Rights

Top Posts

Active Topics

Monthly Archives

About John Battelle

Searchblog Newsletter

Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:


Calendar

November 2007
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Syndicate

Powered by

August 15, 2007 5:10 AM

Leverage

Google's long known that scale means leverage in its search results, and it's also getting very good at doing the same in its financial results. Check this note from Bill Morrison at JMP Securities:

Google Inc. (GOOG - $508.60): Google increases monetization without sacrificing search quality or user experience; reiterate Market Outperform rating and $625 price target. On August 8, 2007, Google announced a significant change in its formula for determining when ads can be promoted to the top (north) position – above the organic search results – from the slots to the right (east) position of the organic search results. Our analysis, detailed in the note below, suggests that the new monetization algorithm could drive Google’s gross revenue 2-4% higher. Google only promotes ads from the east to the north position when ads meet both a minimum quality score (CTR estimate) AND a minimum effective CPM (eCPM) threshold, which is calculated as follows: CTR * CPC * 1000. Previously, when checking whether an ad’s eCPM exceeded the threshold for north promotion, Google used the advertiser’s actual CPC paid, which is typically $0.01 above the next highest bid in the auction, in the CPM calculation. The actual CPC paid is often well below the max CPC bid by an advertiser. Under the new system, Google will change its eCPM calculation by using a CPC that is equal to, or less than, the advertiser’s max bid CPC. This change will result in increases to advertisers’ actual CPC paid when a CPC that is equal to or less than the advertiser’s max bid CPC generates an eCPM that exceeds the threshold eCPM required for north promotion. In addition to the CPC increase, there will be a CTR increase associated with this ranking change that should have an even greater monetization impact. Our research suggests that ads in the north position can generate 2x the CTR of ads in the east position.

In short, fiddling the dials just a bit can mean much better financial results.

  • Posted by John Battelle on August 15, 2007 5:10 AM


Comments

I think this change is much less benign than has been communicated by (and probably to) the JMP guy. I posted about it here - http://www.webx0.com/2007/08/now-thats-not-n.html

Post a comment

Human detector
Please enter the letter "t" in the field below. If you want to preview your comment before posting, enter the secret letter after previewing, not now, as the letter will change upon preview.

Enter the letter from above: