SearchMob!
Recent Comment
Spotlight
Recent Comments
- AGronowski: " I find the site rather dull. ..." [go]
- John Doe: " This company is tanking, I hope to be ab ..." [go]
- Chris: " Just tried to claim that second profile ..." [go]
- Chris: " I can't believe they think they're ready ..." [go]
- patti: " I received the automated call this after ..." [go]
- kozhanse: " RM To iPod Converter is easy-to-use vide ..." [go]
- John Battelle: " Exactly. I can't believe it either. it's ..." [go]
- Slick Willy: " Bill Clinton connection: this was the co ..." [go]
- slovenie: " ..." [go]
- slovenie: " thank you ..." [go]
- Wille: " Oh, can I do a IPO too? I might only be ..." [go]
- Danny Sullivan: " John, you should have been at my house o ..." [go]
- JG: " Couple of my reactions, FWIW: Hav ..." [go]
- JG: " Putting on my Joe Consumer hat for the m ..." [go]
- Tłumacz angielski: " This article is very interesting and wri ..." [go]
- Emlak: " They are now back on the SERPs for that ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 49 comments: Facebook: $6 Billion? Nah. (07.11)
- 14 comments: First Voice Post: Thoughts on Web 2, Google and Auction Game Theory (07.24)
- 9 comments: This Is Not How To Do It - Updated (07.12)
- 8 comments: Gone Fishin' (07.13)
- 7 comments: Facebook: Cooler Than Google? (07.23)
Monthly Archives
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate
Powered by
February 17, 2006 3:14 PM
Free The Internet Through Regulation
That's the general idea of the proposed "Global Online Freedom Act of 2006", the details of which you can find in this article and here (sponsoring congressman's website).
Besides blacklisting Iran, China, and Vietnam (hey, that war really worked out, didn't it?!), the legislation would declare:
- U.S. firms which create, provide or host Internet search engines would be forbidden to locate their search engines within designated Internet-restricting countries.
- U.S. firms would be forbidden to alter the search engines in response to requests from Internet-restricting countries or make changes that produced search engine results within restricting countries that differ from results elsewhere.
- U.S. search engine providers must transparently share with the U.S. Office of Global Internet freedom details of terms or parameters submitted by Internet-restricting countries.
- U.S. businesses maintaining Internet content hosting services can personally identify users only for cases of legitimate law enforcement purposes as determined by the U.S. Department of Justice.
OK, so where the hell is *our* right to know? Will all this information, all this back and forth, will it be public?
- Posted by John Battelle on February 17, 2006 3:14 PM
remember this »- Sphere It
Searchblog Classifieds!
Recent Jobs
Searchblog, in paperback
Searchblog
Print Edition
Get Your Own Print Version of Searchblog
Click here to buy a customized print version of the entire contents of Searchblog.
Post a comment