SearchMob!


Powered by Rollyo

Recent Comment
Spotlight

  • Reader Kamail Jain Writes: Google has a very clean home page. It has links to their advertisement products, may be useful, for 1% of their visitors who advertise on Google. But no link to their privacy policy, which is relevant for 100% of their users. [go]

Recent Comments

  • nmw: " I think I agree -- an educated user woul ..." [go]
  • Joe Duck: " Hold on cowboy.com! All you turn off h ..." [go]
  • dataGuy: " I like the site but I have a suggestion ..." [go]
  • MultiZ: " Abebooks has a similar feature to alibri ..." [go]
  • Fred: " I expect they don't want to comment on t ..." [go]
  • Dominic: " The Google vs Viacom tussle is a repeat ..." [go]
  • tanie linie lotnicze: " Web 2.0 is great, there is no errors ..." [go]
  • Andrew S: " Frauenhofer (the mp3 people) has had thi ..." [go]
  • julio bruno: " Great initiative. Pity is that it only w ..." [go]
  • Joe Duck: " I'm betting a kilobuck on YHOO calls tha ..." [go]
  • Alex C: " First of all there is no way that Viacom ..." [go]
  • Dempsey: " Here's a quip I've come up with (based o ..." [go]
  • Michael Stone: " Let's be honest here. Viacom has two cho ..." [go]
  • cuneyt: " Folks, Great to see a good discussion o ..." [go]
  • Mike: " Sounds like LookSmart's AdCenter. ..." [go]
  • mrspin: " See my post: ..." [go]

PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'

thesearch_bookcover.jpg

Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...

You can also buy the audio version here.

Check my book page for more info.

Blogger's Rights

Top Posts

Active Topics

Monthly Archives

About John Battelle

Searchblog Newsletter

Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:


Calendar

February 2007
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28      

Syndicate

Powered by

August 20, 2006 7:00 PM

Innaresting. Yahoo Aims at Google's Cultural Grammar

Justgoogle
Google is a verb in our culture, in fact, it's more than that, it's a representation of a new way of understanding our relationship to knowledge. That's A Pretty Big Deal, and it's also got to be insanely frustrating to a company like, well, Yahoo, which had the chance to own the very same thing back in the late 90s. (It's also frustrating to the poor sods in Google legal, see here).

So I found this announcement interesting - Yahoo is asking its users to remix its brand, in what seems a clear attempt to nudge the Yahoo brand next to Google's in our cultural reference set. In fact, the blog entry announcing the contest acknowledges Google's dominance in the field:

There's been some reports about how Google is trying to stop people from using the term, googling. When I heard about it, I was like, "Hello, gift horse, mouth!"....People don’t often do what you want them to do, and brands are more about what consumers think, than what companies want. We're ok with that. You want the yodel? Have it anytime you want (just mouse over the ! on the front page and click). Is Yahoo! a verb, noun or exclamation? Maybe it's all of them.

So Yahoo is open sourcing its brand (and its yodel to boot.) Not a bad idea, but ... to quote another famous brand campaign: where's the beef? The only thing that will get culture to form a lasting impression around a brand, one that matters as much as A New Relationship To Knowledge, anyway, is, well, a new relationship to knowledge. That doesn't come around very often. Though, I must admit, I'm eager to see another one soon. It has been more than ten years since Alta Vista and Overture, after all.
(image credit)


Comments

So Yahoo is open sourcing its brand (and its yodel to boot.)


YAHOO as a term has been in existence since the 1726 Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels.

How and why would companies would want to limit what we can an d cannot say.

I guess since the they have done this with some of their other browsers for other counties.

I think that these things are not good for Google. I see this year a lot of good changes in Yahoo.
At the same time that yahoo is working to try to be closer and friendly for the end user, it seems that Google is spending too much energy teaching the people how they would talk.

I suspect the reason Google is examining that particular gift horse's bicuspids (do horses have bicuspids?) is that if "to google" becomes generic, they lose legal control of their brand, and anybody can use it. That happened to "aspirin" (ask Bayer), and Xerox carries on an endless campaign to promote "copy" instead of "xerox" as the verb. "Kleenex" instead of "tissue" is another one.

Does anyone know the term for the common phenomena of using a brand name in place of the "generic"? "Saran Wrap" in place of "plastic wrap", "skidooing" instead of "snowmobiling". They're endless... and there's a term for it but I can't recall, nor can I find it by "googling" it.

I don't know. As far as traffic goes, google is just growing and growing. Sure yahoo has a big portal of sites, but their shareholders don't seem to be to impressed..

Post a comment

Human detector
Please enter the letter "b" in the field below. If you want to preview your comment before posting, enter the secret letter after previewing, not now, as the letter will change upon preview.

Enter the letter from above:





Searchblog Classifieds!

Searchblog, in paperback

Searchblog
Print Edition

Get Your Own Print Version of Searchblog

Get the book

Click here to buy a customized print version of the entire contents of Searchblog.

Categories

Search Resources

License