SearchMob!
Recent Comment
Spotlight
Recent Comments
- Shortshire: " Google appears to be diversifying the pr ..." [go]
- nmw: " psychicwhois.com is neat-o! Can't wait ..." [go]
- gio: " Commenting doesnt seem to work even if i ..." [go]
- BODYGUARDS: " Here lies the technical reasons why this ..." [go]
- Harry: " P.S. As for GOOG's stock price valuatio ..." [go]
- Harry: " Time Warner is one of those companies th ..." [go]
- Harry: " Google's strength in search will continu ..." [go]
- Harry: " I'm sorry, but spying on citizens outsid ..." [go]
- Tom Nocera: " I may be in the minority here, but, I'm ..." [go]
- Oracep: " So exactly where are the gems of insight ..." [go]
- Nomadishere: " Branding2.0 - thats good. I wonder if th ..." [go]
- MultiZ: " If I'm not mistaken, I thought Google wa ..." [go]
- nmw: " Jakob Nielsen said "Seems like a good mo ..." [go]
- nmw: " copy/paste: 03/spring-is-season-for-love ..." [go]
- nmw: " ah, perhaps just a little further back t ..." [go]
- nmw: " John, do you have a crush? I think fina ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 36 comments: The Blog Merchandising Problem, or, Blogs, V 2.0 (2.1? 3.0?) (01.17)
- 28 comments: For What It's Worth (01.10)
- 27 comments: Top 100+ Search Engines (01.02)
- 18 comments: Totally off topic, but.... (01.11)
- 17 comments: NYT: No, No, NO!!! (01.21)
Monthly Archives
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
Syndicate
Powered by
September 8, 2004 2:43 PM
AdSense Update
Well, so far, no response from Mike at Google, save what I updated in the previous post. I did just now get an answer to my tech question, in two days - not bad for a company with millions of such questions, I guess. Long and short: It sometimes takes up to 48 hours for Google to index new posts.
In the meantime, readers have pointed me to many sites with non-compliant wording above their AdSense ads, including at least one that has "Paying the Bills" as its header, just as I did. I'm not going to name them, as that might get them busted too. I have also learned, through reputable sources, that Mike from Google is in fact a person, though clearly he's employing cut and paste email forms.
Which makes me wonder about consistency with a service as vast as AdSense. The site with the same offending title as mine has clearly been around a long time, but I got dinged in the first 24 hours of life. Why? I doubt there's any clear answer to that, and that, for a company which prides itself on algorithmic distance and evenhandedness, is an inconsistency that should be addressed.
One last note: As predicted by many of my pals, from my reports, it doesn't seem like my site is ideal for AdSense. The ads don't change much and focus on the same thing - blogging and ad networks, for the most part. Why don't more SEM/SEO companies show up, I wonder? The endemic advertisers seem unable to find me. Ah well, we'll see how it goes....
UPDATE: Was contacted today (Friday the 10th) by a real person at Google, Joel, who was very nice and had this to say:
I can assure you, your case was handled by a human being. In order to
protect our publishers by keeping a high quality of network as well as
protecting our advertisers interests, we take all of our policy violations
seriously. Because we have such a large volume of publishers, it is hard to
negotiate minor infractions and we sometimes give somewhat robotic replies.
We are constantly working on improving how we handle these cases. And yes,
we are also scrutinizing our policies to make sure we are doing what is best
for our advertisers, web publishers and the viewers of these ads.
With regards to labeling ads, we could not have an open ended policy that
only restricts certain language around the ads. Instead, we have come up
with a short list of allowed language. Unfortunately, "Paying the bills" is
not one of them. For your readers that would like to support you, this
brings attention to the fact that if they click on the ads they will help
you pay your bills. This can quite possibly lead to readers clicking just
because they want to make you money, with no interest in what is on the
other side of the link. This is not good for our advertisers or the AdSense
network as a whole.
Nice to get the human touch. Thanks, Google.
- Posted by John Battelle on September 8, 2004 2:43 PM
remember this »- Sphere It
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AdSense Update:
» My Reaction to Feedburner's Amazon Ads in RSS from Jeremy Zawodny's blog
As part of his ad experiment, John Battelle had some amusing run-ins with Google. He also recently started using Feedburner to inject ads directly into his RSS feed. The screenshot at the right shows what those look like in NetNewsWire (where I read m... [Read More]
- Tracked on November 8, 2004 5:57 PM
Searchblog Classifieds!
Searchblog, in paperback
Searchblog
Print Edition
Get Your Own Print Version of Searchblog
Click here to buy a customized print version of the entire contents of Searchblog.



Comments
in a few weeks people may start bidding on your name, which will make for interesting ads.
Its all in the those keywords John....imagine if you were a crawler writing the perfect page to target ads on.....oh but wait surely this would breach T&C;'s right as your blatantly targeting keywords that have high value ads appearing,
We used to call this spamming before we generated a decent business model for it. Now I think you coined this exploitation of the DOB - right?
As I said more than one way to skin a rabbit :)
I think it's reasonable for Google to want to enforce consistency on how AdSense is labeled. Just like everything, since you started now, you might have gone through different processes than those who started 6 months ago, a year ago, whatever. This is all very common and reasonable.
I've found that weblog entries that refer to concrete / tangible topics end up with much more relevant / interesting AdSense ads. There has to be something about the topic that could conceivably be for sale. Entries on more "abstract" topics yield generic ads.... which stands to reason.
Perhaps SEO companies don't appear because they know contextual advertising doesn't work that well for a large number of companies, so they avoid the practice entirely.
Post a comment