SearchMob!
Recent Comment
Spotlight
Recent Comments
- how to french kiss: " it is about 3 years after your this arti ..." [go]
- JG: " The two will live quite nicely one ne ..." [go]
- Vegas Thornton: " The things about "second comain" is a li ..." [go]
- tpiddy: " is 2007 the year of the metaverse? woul ..." [go]
- Alex: " I wonder if someone tells me a thousand ..." [go]
- Dr. Pete: " What's honestly more intriguing to me ab ..." [go]
- Richard Jennings: " What is the deal with Congoo.com - Anyon ..." [go]
- Tom Nocera: " What could make the concept even better ..." [go]
- Will Davies: " How fascinating. Please tell, pleeeeease ..." [go]
- Andy Redfern: " Google is going to be a good distributio ..." [go]
- Hashim: " How does Krugle compare to Google Code S ..." [go]
- Jake: " That's funny, I thought the idea that an ..." [go]
- Tom Nocera: " Hey John, are you in Davos? Did you see ..." [go]
- epictum: " Here's a trip down memory lane... ..." [go]
- Peter: " C'mon, John. How about giving us a littl ..." [go]
- SorenG: " John, you ever think maybe your predicti ..." [go]
PERFECT FOR THAT PERSON WITH EVERYTHING
Order 'The Search'
Yup, it makes the perfect gift for that officemate or colleague who you thought had everything....including you! If you order here, I promise to sign it, assuming we can figure out the shipping...
You can also buy the audio version here.
Check my book page for more info.
Blogger's Rights
Top Posts
- The Database of Intentions (or how this all got started)
- From Pull to Point(or the first post where I riff on the "Point-To Economy")
- Google As Builder (or the point at which Google stopped being simply a search engine)
- On Google v. Yahoo
- TV and Search Merge
- On Sell Side Advertising
- Battelle Gets Searchstreams
- Search and Immortality
- Toward the Endemic (on endemic advertising)
More coming soon...
Active Topics
- 36 comments: The Blog Merchandising Problem, or, Blogs, V 2.0 (2.1? 3.0?) (01.17)
- 28 comments: For What It's Worth (01.10)
- 27 comments: Top 100+ Search Engines (01.02)
- 20 comments: Predictions 2007 (01.01)
- 18 comments: Totally off topic, but.... (01.11)
Monthly Archives
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
About John Battelle
Searchblog Newsletter
Enter email to subscribe to "Re-Find", Searchblog's weekly newsletter:
Calendar
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate
Powered by
January 1, 2007 6:51 PM
It's Not Your Competition, It's the Environment
A post on Skrenta heralds Google as the winner in the third age of computing. Worth a read, some major points include:
* Yahoo is effectively letting $1.5 billion in revenue sit on the table so long as they chose not to allow AdWords to handle their search monetization.
* "Google is the start page for the Internet. The net isn't a directed graph. It's not a tree. It's a single point labeled G connected to 10 billion destination pages."
* Alluding to Battelle's database of intentions: "Google's CPMs are $90-120, vs. $4-5 for an average browse page view elsewhere. This value premium on search vs. content is because of the massive concentration of choice potential which exists on the decision point, Google."
* Next step, dominating the verticals: "It's actually not inconceivable that they could eventually own all of the destination page views too. Crazy as it sounds, it's conceivable that they could actually end up owning the entire net, or most of what counts. Complaints are already being heard about Google using their starting point power to muscle into verticals." Here Skrenta is referencing the new Google Tips on their homepage, on which Firefox brain Blake Ross, generally a friend of Google, just posted a scathing note of criticism.
* Zero switching costs for users means that a search engine with even a modest advantage will attract a snowball effect of preference, to paraphrase Skrenta. That's an advantage underlined when brand recognition is taken into account.
- Posted by Melanie Colburn on January 1, 2007 6:51 PM
remember this »- Sphere It
Searchblog Classifieds!
Searchblog, in paperback
Searchblog
Print Edition
Get Your Own Print Version of Searchblog
Click here to buy a customized print version of the entire contents of Searchblog.
Comments
Even more importantly Google is a verb
http://www.winextra.com/?p=207
Time for an "open source" search engine without ads and with public algos. Maybe Blake Ross can get that going.
Quote : "Alluding to Battelle's database of intentions: "Google's CPMs are $90-120, vs. $4-5 for an average browse page view elsewhere"
really? Good CPMs..
Well, i agree i guess the idea of a open-source search engine would match and i think there should be a launch with the progess of other technologies.
IMHO, calling an advertisement a "tip" is a disservice to search users.
Also, self-bidding is simply as much dishonest to other buyers as an ebay seller bidding on his item via a separate ebay account.
Even worse, since Google does not use VCG (a truthful bidding mechanism), self bidding hurts competitors. Even if Google ad makes a smaller use of the top ad slot than another advertiser still Google may benefit by showing its own ad there. Therefore drastically hurting other advertisers by charging them the price of the top slot click but showing them on the second place. This issue does not arise if Google shows its own ad at the bottom most ad slot.
I personally have never seen Google own ad on Google search pages at any spot other than the top spot. If anybody else has seen Google's own ad at a second place or lower please do send me a screen-shot.
Disclaimer: The commentator works for Microsoft, a Google competitor. The opinion is his own and could be backed by abstract examples.
Post a comment